E-mail us: service@prospectnews.com Or call: 212 374 2800
Bank Loans - CLOs - Convertibles - Distressed Debt - Emerging Markets
Green Finance - High Yield - Investment Grade - Liability Management
Preferreds - Private Placements - Structured Products
 
Published on 2/3/2016 in the Prospect News Structured Products Daily.

Goldman Sachs reaches top ranking this year with top deal; volume already down 12%

By Emma Trincal

New York, Feb. 3 – Goldman Sachs took the first slot in January’s league tables while Bank of America ranked second, which is very unusual for a firm that is almost always No. 1 in any given month, according to data compiled by Prospect News.

For this first month of 2016, Goldman Sachs priced $1.37 billion in 62 deals, capturing 31% of the total volume for the month.

But this lead is due to the pricing of a record-size deal last week in the amount of $1.07 billion and therefore may not mark a new trend, at least not yet.

The Goldman Sachs notes linked to a basket of international equity benchmarks represented the second largest deal ever to price since UBS AG sold a $2 billion reverse convertible 10 years ago, according to the data.

Goldman Sachs moved up from the No. 3 slot in January 2015. A year ago, it priced $1.06 billion in 56 deals.

Bank of America priced 41 deals totaling $993 million. It represented 22.2% of the total.

Down one slot from last year, JPMorgan was No. 3 with $754 million priced in 161 deals.

Barclays was next, moving up one notch from a year ago, while BMO Capital Markets also jumped up one level to the fifth slot.

UBS

One of the most notable decliners was UBS. This agent, which was ranked No. 4 last year with $472 million, has seen its volume decline by 60% to $189 million. The decline has been felt for several months if not years, according to the data. It is partly because UBS’ strength was its high number of deals, and as those have been plummeting so has the volume. A year ago, UBS priced 252 offerings. Last month, this number fell to 81.

Lackluster volume

The total volume for January is already showing signs of weakness compared to one year ago at $4.47 billion, a 12% decline from $5.07 billion in January 2015. According to the data, such decline is unusual at this time of year.

The month of January in general has been trending up over the past 10 years with only two exceptions four and seven years ago.

In January 2012, volume dropped a third from January 2011 to $2.90 billion.

But the worst decline hit in the immediate aftermath of the financial crisis in January 2009 when volume plummeted 78% $1.56 billion from $6.97 billion a year before.

Commodities

One aspect of this year’s early weakness, which is a continuation of issuance trends seen since August, is the result of market conditions. Commodities are a case in point.

While a year ago, 26 commodity-linked note offerings priced for a modest sum of $117 million, this year only five deals came out in the distressed asset class totaling $10 million. JPMorgan captured two-thirds of the volume in this increasingly shrinking market.

Equity, FX

Given its $1.07 billion deal, Goldman Sachs is now the top agent for equity index-linked notes with $1.37 billion. Bank of America, which is almost always the top agent for these products, is now No. 2 with $907 million.

Without the unusually large deal, however, Bank of America’s lead would be well established.

Despite heavy action in global currency markets, no FX deals printed last month. This asset class is always the smallest in size, but not seeing any deal, even small ones, is highly uncommon, according to past reports.

Single-stock issuance is not encouraging. Volume last month fell two-thirds to $244 million from $720 million. The number of deal is also smaller, falling to 115 from 282.

JPMorgan took the first slot in this asset class, while the former winner, UBS, is now No. 3.

Rates

Appetite for rates is weak, the data showed. Only three deals priced for a total of $19 million. Citigroup remained No. 1 with $11 million.

The interest rate category used in these league tables does not include some lightly structured plain-vanilla notes, which Prospect News calls interest rates with structured coupons.

Those, which include step-up notes, step-down notes, fixed-to-floating notes and capped floaters, are listed and counted separately. They are not included in the overall totals.

First Tennessee was No. 1 in this category.

The market size for structured coupons is shrinking too. Volume has fallen 42% to $2.46 billion from $4.27 billion a year ago.

For the issuers’ league table, the top three banks have kept their respective rankings of last year. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. is No. 1 with $1.18 billion. It is followed by Barclays Bank plc and Credit Suisse AG, London Branch.

All structured products, no ETNS, by agent, January

2015 Comparables

UnderwriterAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Goldman Sachs1.3736230.73%31.0575620.85%
2Bank of America0.9934122.23%11.2053523.78%
3JPMorgan0.75416116.89%21.14714522.64%
4Barclays0.305626.82%50.317416.25%
5BMO0.195234.36%60.22764.48%
6UBS0.189814.23%40.4722529.32%
7Credit Suisse0.122512.72%80.141382.79%
8Morgan Stanley0.113252.54%70.217484.28%
9Citigroup0.113252.53%110.048130.95%
10Deutsche Bank0.091132.03%120.04390.85%
Total4.4666325.068727
Average size:0.0070.007
All structured products, by agent, January
2015 Comparables
UnderwriterAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Credit Suisse1.70615428.14%40.91912615.70%
2Goldman Sachs1.3736222.65%31.0575618.06%
3Bank of America0.9934116.38%11.2053520.59%
4JPMorgan0.75416112.45%21.14714519.61%
5Barclays0.305625.02%60.317415.41%
6BMO0.195233.21%70.22763.88%
7UBS0.189813.12%50.4722528.07%
8Morgan Stanley0.113251.87%80.217483.71%
9Citigroup0.113251.86%110.048130.83%
10Deutsche Bank0.091131.50%120.04390.74%
Total6.0617425.852822
Average size:0.0080.007
ETNS, by agent, January
2015 Comparables
UnderwriterAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Credit Suisse1.58410399.36%10.7778899.14%
2Nuveen0.01070.64%20.00770.86%
Total1.5941100.78495
Average size:0.0140.008
Commodity structured products, no ETNS, by agent, January
2015 Comparables
UnderwriterAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1JPMorgan0.006362.70%10.0421035.80%
2UBS0.003131.36%70.00110.58%
3Morgan Stanley0.00115.93%30.029724.86%
Total0.01050.11726
Average size:0.0020.004
Equity index structured products, no ETNS, by agent, January
2015 Comparables
UnderwriterAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Goldman Sachs1.3675936.68%20.9255025.81%
2Bank of America0.9073724.33%11.0612629.61%
3JPMorgan0.62911316.86%30.8576023.90%
4Barclays0.267457.17%50.179265.00%
5Credit Suisse0.101402.72%60.115273.21%
6Citigroup0.096192.57%100.01760.47%
7UBS0.073131.97%40.239366.68%
8Morgan Stanley0.072131.94%80.064171.79%
9Deutsche Bank0.070111.87%110.00630.18%
10HSBC0.050261.35%70.073342.03%
Total3.7284163.585300
Average size:0.0090.012
Foreign exchange structured products, no ETNS, by agent, January
2015 Comparables
UnderwriterAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
Total0.00000.0346
Average size:0.006
Interest rate structured products, no ETNS, by agent, January
2015 Comparables
UnderwriterAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Citigroup0.011156.23%10.009137.92%
2Wells Fargo0.007138.41%
3Morgan Stanley0.00115.36%20.007129.49%
Total0.01930.0246
Average size:0.0060.004
Single stock structured products, no ETNS, by agent, January
2015 Comparables
UnderwriterAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1JPMorgan0.0743030.32%20.1644622.79%
2Bank of America0.071328.87%40.090412.44%
3UBS0.0314712.62%10.20119127.94%
4Barclays0.01786.88%50.082811.34%
5RBC0.01566.17%70.02994.03%
6Morgan Stanley0.01556.09%60.042135.88%
7HSBC0.00933.57%100.00010.06%
8Credit Suisse0.00582.12%90.00851.09%
9Citigroup0.00431.65%80.01341.86%
10Goldman Sachs0.00411.44%30.091112.57%
Total0.2441150.720282
Average size:0.0020.003
Interest rate products with structured coupons (not included above), by agent, January
2015 Comparables
UnderwriterAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1First Tennessee0.2461110.01%40.265136.20%
2Piper Jaffray0.17777.23%110.127132.98%
3Multi-Bank0.160106.51%
4Cantor0.11014.48%140.10472.44%
5Mizuho0.10734.38%260.03320.78%
6Incapital0.08753.56%100.155143.63%
6Vining0.087103.56%20.354198.28%
8RBC0.08653.51%360.02230.53%
9Finacorp0.07963.22%90.158173.68%
10Mesirow0.07543.05%170.08561.99%
Total2.456954.275148
Average size:0.0260.029
Interest rate products with structured coupons (not included above), no agencies, by agent, January
2015 Comparables
UnderwriterAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1RBC0.036344.72%40.010211.90%
2Bank of America0.019123.73%
3Wells Fargo0.014217.40%
4BMO0.00718.59%
5TD0.00424.94%20.018321.60%
6Barclays0.00110.62%50.00515.95%
Total0.081100.08413
Average size:0.0080.006
All structured products, no ETNs, by issuer, January
2015 Comparables
IssuerAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.1.1812026.45%11.0926421.56%
2Barclays Bank plc0.5177311.58%21.0205520.12%
3Credit Suisse AG, London Branch 0.348737.80%30.7117714.03%
4Bank of America Corp. 0.33397.46%50.47599.38%
5Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce 0.323157.23%
6JPMorgan Chase & Co. 0.322967.20%40.4771159.41%
7Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch0.285286.38%110.107282.12%
8Bank of Montreal0.195234.36%70.22764.48%
9GS Finance Corp. (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.)0.191424.28%
10HSBC USA Inc.0.184504.11%60.230644.53%
Total4.4666325.068727
Average size:0.0070.007
All structured products, by issuer, January
2015 Comparables
IssuerAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Credit Suisse AG, Nassau Branch 1.59310826.28%30.8009113.67%
2Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.1.1812019.49%11.0926418.67%
3Barclays Bank plc0.517738.54%21.0205517.42%
4Credit Suisse AG, London Branch 0.348735.75%40.7117712.15%
5Bank of America Corp. 0.33395.49%60.47598.13%
6Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce 0.323155.33%
7JPMorgan Chase & Co. 0.322965.31%50.4771158.15%
8Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch0.285284.70%120.107281.84%
9Bank of Montreal0.195233.21%80.22763.88%
10GS Finance Corp. (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.)0.191423.16%
Total6.0617425.852822
Average size:0.0080.007
Commodity structured products, no ETNS, by issuer, January
2015 Comparables
IssuerAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1JPMorgan Chase & Co. 0.006362.70%30.025621.42%
2UBS AG, London Branch 0.003131.36%50.01048.62%
3Morgan Stanley0.00115.93%20.029724.86%
Total0.01050.11726
Average size:0.0020.004
Equity index structured products, no ETNS, by issuer, January
2015 Comparables
IssuerAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.1.1812031.69%10.9565626.68%
2Barclays Bank plc0.4135411.07%20.8213222.91%
3Bank of America Corp. 0.32588.72%40.443512.37%
4Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce 0.323158.66%
5Credit Suisse AG, London Branch 0.318548.53%30.6555418.27%
6Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch0.245236.58%100.02170.58%
7JPMorgan Chase & Co. 0.206525.53%50.216456.02%
8GS Finance Corp. (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.)0.186394.99%
9HSBC USA Inc.0.157354.21%60.171384.78%
10Citigroup Inc.0.086172.30%110.01760.47%
Total3.7284163.585300
Average size:0.0090.012
Foreign exchange structured products, no ETNS, by issuer, January
2015 Comparables
IssuerAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
Total0.00000.0346
Average size:0.006
Interest rate structured products, no ETNS, by issuer, January
2015 Comparables
IssuerAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Citigroup Inc.0.011156.23%10.009137.92%
2Wells Fargo & Co.0.007138.41%
3Morgan Stanley0.00115.36%20.007129.49%
Total0.01930.0246
Average size:0.0060.004
Single stock structured products, no ETNS, by issuer, January
2015 Comparables
IssuerAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Barclays Bank plc0.069928.19%20.1191416.55%
2JPMorgan Chase & Co. 0.0652726.75%10.1623922.54%
3UBS AG, London Branch 0.0294611.95%50.07914610.97%
4Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch0.01937.58%60.042145.87%
5Royal Bank of Canada 0.01566.17%30.1012513.99%
6Morgan Stanley0.01445.68%70.041125.74%
7HSBC USA Inc.0.01044.20%80.039115.39%
8Bank of America Corp. 0.00813.21%
9Credit Suisse AG, London Branch 0.008113.18%90.033164.53%
10Citigroup Inc.0.00431.65%100.01341.86%
Total0.2441150.720282
Average size:0.0020.003
Prospect News Structured Products Rankings
Criteria

• The tables include all dollar-denominated offerings sold in the United States as public, Rule 144A or similar deals reported to Prospect News.

• Offerings are included in the time period in which they price.

• Amounts are based on the total sales price (face amount multiplied by the offering price). The full amount is credited to the lead manager. For multiple managers, the total value is divided equally among all the firms.

• Each tranche is counted as a separate deal.

• Notes are included that convert into or are linked to one or more stocks, indexes, commodities, currencies, interest rates or other assets.

• Interest-rate products with a structured coupon but no underlier, such as step-up notes, step-down notes, fixed-to-floating notes and capped floaters, are listed separately; they are not included in overall totals. Agencies are included in this category.


© 2015 Prospect News.
All content on this website is protected by copyright law in the U.S. and elsewhere. For the use of the person downloading only.
Redistribution and copying are prohibited by law without written permission in advance from Prospect News.
Redistribution or copying includes e-mailing, printing multiple copies or any other form of reproduction.