New York, April 4 - Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP was the top underwriter's counsel for high-yield bonds for the first quarter, according to data compiled by Prospect News.
For issuer's counsel, use of an in-house attorney ranked first. Vinson & Elkins LLP worked on the largest dollar amount of deals where an external law firm was used.
Cahill, which also took the number one spot for the year-to-date rankings in February, was far ahead of other firms as underwriter's counsel, accounting for $24.13 billion in 37 deals, or 24.6% of the market. That was almost 2.5 times as much as the second placed firm, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, which advised underwriters for $9.39 billion of new issues in 19 transactions. Cravath Swaine & Moore LLP was third at $5.34 billion in seven deals.
In-house counsel was the leading source of advice for issuers, accounting for $5.06 billion, or 5.2% of the total.
Vinson & Elkins, the leading external firm, advised on 11 deals totaling $3.09 billion, or 3.2% of the market.
The tables cover high-yield bond deals offered in the United States via a registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission or under Rule 144A. The identity of legal advisers was not available for all deals, particularly those from emerging markets issuers.
Underwriter's counsel, U.S. market, all issuers, year to date
| Underwriter's counsel | Amount | No. | Share |
|
1 | Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP | 24.126 | 37 | 24.61% |
|
2 | Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP | 9.391 | 19 | 9.58% |
|
3 | Cravath Swaine & Moore LLP | 5.340 | 7 | 5.45% |
|
4 | Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP | 5.142 | 9 | 5.25% |
|
5 | Shearman & Sterling LLP | 4.966 | 10 | 5.07% |
|
6 | Latham & Watkins LLP | 4.903 | 11 | 5.00% |
|
7 | Baker Botts LLP | 2.031 | 6 | 2.07% |
|
8 | Vinson & Elkins LLP | 1.181 | 3 | 1.20% |
|
9 | Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison LLP | 0.975 | 2 | 0.99% |
|
10 | Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP | 0.796 | 2 | 0.81% |
|
| Total | 98.020 | 199 |
|
|
Underwriter's counsel, U.S. market, U.S. issuers, year to date |
|
|
|
| Underwriter's counsel | Amount | No. | Share |
|
1 | Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP | 22.573 | 34 | 28.54% |
|
2 | Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP | 8.590 | 16 | 10.86% |
|
3 | Latham & Watkins LLP | 4.903 | 11 | 6.20% |
|
4 | Cravath Swaine & Moore LLP | 4.090 | 6 | 5.17% |
|
5 | Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP | 3.250 | 5 | 4.11% |
|
6 | Shearman & Sterling LLP | 2.676 | 6 | 3.38% |
|
7 | Baker Botts LLP | 2.031 | 6 | 2.57% |
|
8 | Vinson & Elkins LLP | 1.181 | 3 | 1.49% |
|
9 | Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP | 0.796 | 2 | 1.01% |
|
10 | Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP | 0.500 | 1 | 0.63% |
|
| Total | 79.091 | 152 |
|
|
Issuer's counsel, U.S. market, all issuers, year to date |
|
|
|
| Issuer's counsel | Amount | No. | Share |
|
1 | In house | 5.057 | 17 | 5.16% |
|
2 | Vinson & Elkins LLP | 3.094 | 11 | 3.16% |
|
3 | Baker Botts LLP | 2.616 | 5 | 2.67% |
|
4 | Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP | 2.521 | 6 | 2.57% |
|
5 | Bracewell & Giuliani LLP | 2.102 | 3 | 2.14% |
|
6 | Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP | 2.089 | 3 | 2.13% |
|
7 | Shearman & Sterling LLP | 2.058 | 6 | 2.10% |
|
8 | Sullivan & Cromwell LLP | 1.950 | 2 | 1.99% |
|
9 | Kirkland & Ellis LLP | 1.762 | 3 | 1.80% |
|
10 | Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy LLP | 1.700 | 3 | 1.73% |
|
| Total | 98.020 | 199 |
|
|
Issuer's counsel, U.S. market, U.S. issuers, year to date |
|
|
|
| Issuer's counsel | Amount | No. | Share |
|
1 | In house | 5.057 | 17 | 6.39% |
|
2 | Vinson & Elkins LLP | 2.995 | 10 | 3.79% |
|
3 | Baker Botts LLP | 2.616 | 5 | 3.31% |
|
4 | Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP | 2.221 | 5 | 2.81% |
|
5 | Bracewell & Giuliani LLP | 2.102 | 3 | 2.66% |
|
6 | Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP | 2.089 | 3 | 2.64% |
|
7 | Sullivan & Cromwell LLP | 1.950 | 2 | 2.47% |
|
8 | Shearman & Sterling LLP | 1.747 | 4 | 2.08% |
|
9 | Kirkland & Ellis LLP | 1.762 | 3 | 2.23% |
|
10 | Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy LLP | 1.200 | 2 | 1.51% |
|
| Total | 79.091 | 152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prospect News High Yield Counsel Rankings
|
|
Criteria
• The tables include all underwritten dollar-denominated offerings sold in the United States as public or Rule 144A deals reported to Prospect News.
• Convertibles, trust preferreds, capital securities and preferred stock are excluded.
• Deals rated investment grade by either Standard & Poor's or Moody's Investors Service are excluded, but deals not rated by both are included.
• Offerings are included in the time period in which they price.
• Amounts are based on the total sales price (face amount multiplied by the offering price). The full amount is credited to the issuer's counsel or underwriter's counsel. For multiple firms, the total value is divided equally.
• Units made up of a bond and a warrant are included; other units are excluded.
• Sovereign issues are excluded.
• Each tranche is counted as a separate deal.
• Passthroughs, collateral trust and equipment trust certificates are included.
• Best efforts and non-underwritten deals are excluded as are remarketings.
© 2015 Prospect News.
All content on this website is protected by copyright law in the U.S. and elsewhere.
For the use of the person downloading only.
Redistribution and copying are prohibited by law without written permission in advance from Prospect News.
Redistribution or copying includes e-mailing, printing multiple copies or any other form of reproduction.